October 29, 2005

Nikon D200, viral marketing and Zen

This week is a big week in Nikonland. At the last the D200 looks like it will finally arrive. For most of the year Nikon has benefited from (orchestrated?) a viral marketing campaign par excellance. In the discussion forums of the major photography sites (for example dpreview and Nikonians) there has been constant chatter and speculation: what will it look like, what specification, what price and so on. Fantasy wish lists and endless rumours from people who have seen it, spoken to people who seen it, had word from a friend who knows somebody who may have seen a prototype, or simply just stuff made up. Occasionally a fake picture of varying quality surfaces on the web and is immediately cross posted fuelling yet more speculation. Statements from Nikon employees are deconstructed and release dates imagined. Finally, Nikon resort to the old trick of ‘accidentally’ posting photos of the new camera on their web site for a couple of hours. The second coming would generate less hype and emotion than this. People have paid money to dealers as a pre order for a camera with an unknown specification. Part of this is pure commodity fetishism as it is unlikely that the D200 will in most circumstances enable the frantic consumer to take better pictures than they do already; but something else is also going on here.

Photographers are often emotionally attached to their cameras. This is not as strange as may be thought. Herrigel in Zen and the Art of Archery makes the point that to be a successful archer the mind, eye, hand, bow, arrow and target need to become one. Furthermore, the arrow needs to release itself at what might be called the decisive moment. The equipment is carefully selected (it has to be a bow that feels right for you). Through this process the equipment you use becomes and an extension of yourself. The same is true for photography. Even basic text books tell you to practice using the camera until you can change the settings instinctively. Leica cameras are good because the viewfinder allows you to see the world as if the camera was not there. Buying the D200 is an emotional act because the camera mediates the individuals exploration of, and interaction with, the world. This has added intensity as owning and using this camera also contributes to self identify and self esteem. But as many posters in the fora have commented, in travelling down this road we seen to have lost sight of the purpose of making photographs.

October 24, 2005

Degas, KT Tunstall and camera-phones

Friday at the Degas exhibition in London. A young woman, maybe 14 or 15, is making her own collection of Degas picture on her mobile phone. Good stuff, but then what does she do with it? Sitting on the tube suddenly needing to look at a Degas? Making poor quality reproductions? At the same time a number of people were walking around with little handhelds containing information about the exhibition. Standing in front of these luminescent paintings but instead looking at a 2 x 3 inch screen. Walter Benjamin thought that paintings used to have an ‘aura’ that gave them their emotional power. But in what he called the ‘age of mechanical reproduction’ this power has been lost. The Tate Gallery itself helps to undermine this effect by reproducing art as mugs and fridge magnets. But we have lost the habit of looking directly at art. So when we see the Degas paintings live they have an impact that is surprising and intense. It’s a pity therefore that this opportunity is thrown away by the need to stare at digital screens.

Saturday at the KT Tunstall gig at the Shepherds Bush Empire. Looking down from the top tier there is a sea of mobile screen lights. After the pre gig txting has finished the camera-phoning starts. Some people are just taking souvenir photos others spend the whole concert taking pictures. Two guys in front of me spend the whole time peering into 1 inch screens taking pictures of a small fuzzy orange blob. Meawhille KT is producing a storming set.

Some digital artists produce creative work with camera phones (here and here). But this is not what is going on. It is as if people cannot experience the world directly, but have to mediate the experience through a screen. In the world of the simulacra experience is only meaningful if it’s on a screen. "It is no longer a question of imitation, nor duplication, nor even parody. It is a question of substituting the signs of the real for the real" (Baudrillard).

October 23, 2005

London Pictures




Sloan Square and Autumn Light, Pimlico

October 7, 2005

Calendar: Images of Tibet 2006


Full colour images of Tibet. 50% of the proceeds will be donated to support Tibetan refugees. The calendar can be purchased through Lulu


See here and here for information about Tibetan refugees and what can be done.

The Potala, Lhasa

October 1, 2005

ZoneZero

Chinese tourist outside the Jokang: the holiest site in Tibet.


Small portfolio of my Tibet photos now on the ZoneZero site.

The
ZoneZero site is dedicated to photography and its journey from the analog to digital world. The site describes itself thus:

The name ZoneZero has actually several origins: it comes from combining the digital representation as in one-zero. Plus the notion that the Zero Zero has to do with being at the very center, the starting point if you will, from which new directions for photography will hopefully emanate. To use the words of the French poet Louis Aragon, in his preface to Modern Mythology. “ Light is meaningful only in relation to darkness, and truth presupposes error. It is these mingled opposites which people our life, which make it pungent, intoxicating. We only exist in terms of conflict, in the zone where black and white clash”. Hence ZoneZero